Right wingers may want to frame the marriage tax break as “keeping more of my money” What the tax break is about is just dumping more burdens onto single men. Single men in employment will have to make up for the tax shortfall by paying more, they are discriminated against for their lifestyle choice.
I believe the marriage tax cut is done to not only encourage more people to get married, but to encourage more women to stay at home as housewives. The tax cut is meant to go to the married woman. The marriage tax cut is not only meant to encourage marriage, but also the trad con lifestyle.
If both partners pulled their weight in a marriage, and worked equally no tax break would be needed, because both parties could pool their resources and make cost efficiency savings. Women are not interested in this though, they would rather put more burdens on their married partners.
Right wingers will shamelessly pocket the marriage tax break, then call you a communist for objecting to their free ride. Married people have children and send them to schools, who pays for that? The single people who do not get a tax break that is who. These right wingers will shamelessly put more burdens onto single men, then cry about the none aggression principle and how taxes are theft. Then they will reverse victim and deny offensive and accuse you of wanting to steal their hard earned money from them. Right wingers are just as shameless as the average feminist.
Also if the woman is not working, that means she is not contributing taxes, and will have to take out the pension pot. If the woman gets divorced she will use the state funded divorce court system. If she alienates the father that means she is damaging her kids, and causing more chaos to society. There are all sorts of costs associated with marriage that are unseen. Married people pass all sort of externalities onto society. Remember the costs and damage divorce inflicts on society is part of the institution of marriage.
Right wingers whine about the state being evil, but will shamelessly use the state to get their state enforced marriage contract. The institution of marriage is the state interfering in peoples lives, yet somehow marriage is natural and part of the human condition.
A lot of married men know the risks of marriage, but they want that marriage tax break so they can gain more resources to bribe women with, they are taking a gamble. Therefore I will not longer advocate for the rights of married or divorced men. Married men choose to scab other men out, they choose to take that tax break, they choose to keep the anti male institution of marriage alive by buying into a marriage slavery contract.
Fixing marriage should not be a men’s rights position, a functional men’s rights movement would only focus on getting rid of the marriage tax break. If the marriage tax break was gotten rid of, I believe marriage rates would decline sharply. Less men would take the gamble, and without the tax break less women would get married, as men without the tax break would have less to offer women.
Marriage is an outdated anti male institution kept on life support. Marriage is not a natural foundation of western civilization, but merely a byproduct, what is the point of marriage? Does it guarantee men paternity?? Does it allow men to hand an inheritance down to his kids? No it is merely a transfer of resources to women. The woman can gobble all the resources up, neglect the kids, boot them out, get another man get married again if she is lucky, and gain even more resources from her new partner. Her kids could be homeless and on the streets once they are too old to get child support. No one is forcing the mother to look after the kids properly Marriage is an incentive for selfish anti social female behavior, at the cost of desperate men.
I rejected marriage on every single principle, there is no reforming or redeeming such a disgusting institution. I reject the MGTOW marriage strike, I want marriage completely abolished. If pro male men can not abolish it, then I will settle for getting rid of all the tax breaks and subsidies married couples get. If anti male trad con men want to get married, let them take on the risks of divorce, but they should not get any incentives for doing so. They should not put any any burdens on other men, and make them pay more taxes. If married men pay less taxes, single men pay more. single men are getting fucked over, it is that simple.